Okay, so my opinion about this series has vacillated a
bit. I may have gotten a little caught up in the suspense and
excitement of the second book (or was possibly temporarily hijacked by The Capitol) but
now that the third one’s done and I’m starting to breathe normally again, I think
I was right the first time round. A warning: I’m going to be as vague as I can
be, but I really, really don’t want to spoil anything about the books for you,
so if you haven’t already read this series but may want to someday in future
then perhaps you should stop reading here and come back to this post after
you’re done (like, tomorrow. They really don't take long to read).
Ignoring my conscience, I really did enjoy this
series. The suspense is handled superbly and the writing is clever and
surprisingly fun and the characters are layered and interesting and mostly (the
goodies, at least) likeable. Plus, there’s nothing like finishing a three-part
series of novels in a week to make you feel like you’re being incredibly
productive with your free time. I’ve heard that some people don’t like Mockingjay, the
third and final book in The Hunger Games series; I did. I thought that by the end every knot had been tied and every ’t’ dotted, or whatever
it is they say.
However, one can only suspend one’s morals for so long
before one starts to get a royal headache, and mine woke up almost as soon as I jumped into bed after finishing this book (I stayed up; it’s almost
impossible to put this book down after the halfway mark*). Katniss does a lot
more thinking about killing and consequences in both the second and third
books, and struggles with what (she feels) she’s been made to do, as well as
the impact of her actions on the safety of others. But alongside these
ponderings, throughout this whole book, she’s focussed on killing the person
who orchestrated it all, while somehow not seeing how illogical it is to want
to murder someone because they murdered someone else. It’s like smacking a
child in an attempt to teach them not to hit: It just doesn’t make sense.
What makes your
murder okay, but theirs wrong? And why are your loved ones more important than the loved ones of those you
kill on the way to fulfilling your goal? Huh, Katniss? A person may love their
family and seem all concerned about the right things, but if they’re willing to
sacrifice other lives/relationships for the (perceived) sake of a sibling, they’re
actually not concerned about the right things at all, nor are they a
particularly nice or trustworthy person. I’m still not sure how I feel about
Katniss; she may be a little too human for my liking: Unforgiving,
self-centred, unapologetic. Part of me kinda wants my heroines (and heros) to
be better than I am, someone I can aspire to be.
The books have interesting things to say about war and power and humanity and the nothing-new-under-the-sun-ness of Ecclesiastes 1: “No one remembers the former generations, and even
those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow them” (1:11). Considering everything, I’d probably recommend this series to others, with a warning
about the violence, of course, as well as a long but riveting lecture on
literature for young people these days.
* Sonia, I can’t believe you were able to go to sleep
and work a whole day with only two chapters left!! I admire you. You’re a much
stronger woman than I.
Ha! Yes it was extremely difficult but I wanted to finish in a good state of mind. I agree and disagree though. Just because the protagonist is flawed and comes to decisions I disagree with then I don't think it's not worth reading and enjoying. It's written as a strong dystopia and, I believe, within that genre, a character enivatebly becoming similar in thinking ( in this case killing) as those that are seen throughout as morally outrageous iis a convention that leads to the reader fully realizing the dystopian world.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I was upset by aspects of the ending and katniss' reasonings
Sorry Iphone stuffed up half way through that comment. So here is second half
ReplyDelete... especially in regards to killing. I think Suzanne Collins feels she justifies this because of Katniss' mental state and conditions at the end (sorry trying to be ambiguous)and again because of a dystopian genre.
In the end I say great books. Not what I would decide but made me think about my conscience and where I would stand and therefore I think it's a good one :)
I think I agree Annelise - I want my heroes/heroines to be better than she was. Or at least to attempt to change when she identified her own flaws (which she did surprisingly often). I think her sense of entitlement also jarred with me a little. Why should she have the special right for revenge? And, yes, why such a double standard when it comes to morality? I think also the whole relational situation bothered me. I hate it when people mess with other peoples hearts because they can't make up their own mind.
ReplyDeleteAll that said, I did love reading the books and thought they did the dystopia thing well. I used to teach a unit on speculative fiction and I would definitely recommend these to the kids to read. Lots of interesting issues raised!
I totally agree with the messing with other peoples' hearts thing; I didn't quite believe that she wouldn't have worked out her (and his) feelings much earlier. For someone who so cleverly works out Haymitch's "messages" in the first book, Katniss comes across as incredibly dense relationship-wise. And I agree with the dystopia thing too, now that I've looked up the definition. :o)
ReplyDeleteI think my main problem is not with the yukkiness in this series specifically, but with the commonalities between the series (plural - serieses?) for young people that have been most popular over recent years (as I mentioned in an earlier post about the first Hunger Games book) - it seems there's a growing trend towards violence that I'm not completely comfortable with.